🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include lowering the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid wider concerns about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “following international guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the legislation is approved.

International experts actually suggests a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for various offences “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.