As a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Is the Top Solution for American Healthcare
Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.
Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.
The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly
According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.
Currently the government is shut down because political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.
When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.
How National Health Insurance Could Function
Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.
Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.
Implementation for America
For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.
Benefits for Small Businesses
Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).
It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.
Free-Market Viewpoint
I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.
Addressing Concerns
Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.
Time for Realistic Evaluation
We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.